AT THE CONTINENTAL HOTEL IN BOSTON WE HAD A MEETING WITH ROBERT SAND. ON THIS PAGE YOU WILL HEAR THE ENTIRE MEETING THAT WE HAD WITH ROBERT SAND. YOU WILL HEAR THE PROMISES AND BETRAYALS. YOU WILL HEAR SANDS' DESPERATION AS HE TRIES TO CONVINCE US THAT HE WANTS TRUE JUSTICE. YOU WILL HEAR HIS EXCUSES TO WHY HE IS NOW BRINGING CHARGES. YOU WILL HEAR HOW HE REPEATEDLY REFUSES TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS, "WHY DID YOU DO WHAT YOU DID IN THE GRAND JURY? WHY DID YOU MANIPULATE EVIDENCE FOR BOLASKI?" 

YOU WILL HEAR A DESPERATE MAN IN A DESPERATE SITUATION. YOU WILL HEAR A CORRUPT DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN HIS OWN WORDS TELL LIE UPON LIE. YOU WILL HEAR THE DECEIT AND TREACHERY OF A TRUSTED PUBLIC SERVANT BETRAYING THAT TRUST. AS YOU LISTEN TO THE TAPE YOU'LL READ INSIDE THE MIND OF THIS MAN. YOU'LL HEAR HIS INCREDULOUS STATEMENTS AS HE TRIES TO EXPLAIN WHAT HE'S DONE. YOU'LL LISTEN AS HE DIGS HIMSELF DEEPER AND DEEPER INTO A HOLE AND HE BRINGS EVERYONE DOWN WITH HIM INCLUDING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE AND EVEN THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE

AFTER HEARING ALL OF THIS FROM ROBERT SAND YOU WILL ASK YOURSELF... "WOULD YOU TRUST THIS MAN?"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING ROBERT SAND ALMOST IMMEDIATELY STARTS BY TRYING TO CONVINCE ME TO STOP WRITING  ON MY WEBSITE ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON. AS YOU'LL HEAR I ASK SEVERAL TIMES AS TO WHY WE SHOULD TRUST HIM NOW AND WHY HE DIDN'T PRESENT THE EVIDENCE TO THE GRAND JURY. HE WILL NOT ANSWER. HE CHANGES THE SUBJECT REPEATEDLY.

WHEN HE FILED THE MANSLAUGHTER CHARGES HE STATED TO THE COURT THAT NEW EVIDENCE HAS COME FORWARD FOR HIS REASON FOR FILING THE NEW CHARGES. YOU'LL HEAR HIM STATE THAT THERE WAS NO NEW EVIDENCE. HE TELLS US THAT THE REASON HE FILED WAS BECAUSE RIGHT AFTER THE GRAND JURY HE MADE AN OFFER TO BOLASKI THAT IF HE PLEADED GUILTY TO THE ASSAULT CHARGES THEN SAND WOULD DROP MURDER CHARGES AGAINST HIM! SINCE HE REFUSED TO PLEAD OUT SAND FILED MURDER CHARGES...A YEAR LATER! SO HE'S SAYING HE GAVE BOLASKI A YEAR TO MAKE UP HIS MIND! THAT WAS ABSOLUTELY LUDICROUS!  AND WHY WOULD HE DOWN GRADE THE CHARGES FROM MURDER TO ASSAULT WHEN HE HAD SUCH GOOD EVIDENCE FOR A MURDER CHARGE? HE CAN'T GIVE US A GOOD REASON. IF ANYTHING IT SHOWED US HIS FAVORITISM FOR BOLASKI FROM THE BEGINNING.

BUT WHAT HE'S TELLING US MADE NO SENSE AT ALL! WHY HOLD THE GRAND JURY, THEN NOT PRESENT THE EVIDENCE FOR THE MURDER CHARGE, THEN WHEN BOLASKI'S FREED MAKE HIM AN OFFER TO PLEAD TO THE SAME CHARGES THAT HE WAS JUST FREED ON!? HIS LOGIC WAS INCREDIBLY ABSURD! DID HE ACTUALLY THINK THAT WE WOULD BELIEVE THAT? DID HE THINK THAT WE WERE THAT GULLIBLE AND STUPID?

WHAT DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN THE WORLD WOULD EVER DO THIS...HOLD A GRAND JURY SPECIFICALLY TO FREE A KILLER, THEN WHEN HE'S FREED MAKE HIM AN OFFER TO PLEAD TO THE SAME CHARGES YOU JUST FREED HIM ON AND THEN GIVE THE KILLER A YEAR TO MAKE UP HIS MIND!? WOULDN'T YOU MAKE THAT OFFER BEFORE YOU HOLD A GRAND JURY? WHEN WE QUESTIONED HIM ON THAT HE DODGED AND DANCED AROUND ANSWERING AND HE NEVER REALLY ANSWERS THE QUESTION...

(CONTINUED)





©